The Contraceptives Security (CS) Indicators toolkit presents tools and resources on family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH) intended for a wide audience, including public and private entities, social actors, family planning services donors, among others. The toolkit content ranges from a high-level perspective on contraceptive security and background on the origins, objectives and methodology of the CS Indicators survey to actionable and interactive resources, including the CS Indicators Reports, databases and the accompanying interactive 2017 and 2019 Survey Dashboards.
Contraceptive security means everyone is able to choose, obtain and use a wide range of high-quality and affordable contraceptive methods, when they need them, for FP/RH and the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases.
Multiple factors across several sectors contribute to the availability and accessibility of contraceptives within countries, including political commitment, financial capital, partner coordination, capacity, client demand and use, and commodity availability. As demand for FP continues to grow and outpace donor financing, the ability of governments and other stakeholders to direct resources and legislation in support of supply chains and service delivery increases in importance. It is particularly critical that governments work with the private sector to ensure the overall availability of a good mix of contraceptive methods.
USAID, under the USAID/DELIVER Project, developed the CS Indicators in 2009 to help in-country and global aid program managers, advocates and decision makers to measure and track countries’ progress in improving access to contraceptives, particularly for those areas requiring more focused interventions. GHSC-PSM took over data collection in 2017 and conducts the survey every two years. In 2017, 36 countries across Africa, Eurasia, Latin America and the Caribbean responded to the survey. In 2019, 43 countries responded to the survey. Additional history on the development of the survey is available here.
This study’s immediate objective is to continue to document CS outcomes at the country and global levels, contributing to the global knowledge base for FP/RH. The CS Indicators assist stakeholders and countries in obtaining data and monitoring progress in support of initiatives such as FP2020 and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
The CS Indicators build off the Strategic Pathway for Reproductive Health Commodity Security (SPARHCS) framework as an approach to assess, identify, and prioritize RH issues around the “7 Cs”: context, commitment, coordination, capital, capacity, commodities, and client demand and use. The CS Indicators were designed to complement the former CS Index, now the Contextual Measures, which help countries identify strengths and weaknesses across five components — financing, supply chain, utilization, access, and health and social environment.
Additional information on the details and usage of the survey are available below:
The CS survey report for 2017 is currently available, with the 2019 report coming in late August. These reports present CS data from 36 and 43 countries, respectively, focusing on findings from key indicators such as leadership and coordination, finance and procurement, policies, commodities, quality and private sector. The reports aim to enable program managers, advocates and decision makers in countries as well as in the global health community to monitor progress toward CS, inform program planning and advocate for improved policies and resources.
The CS survey downloadable datasets are a comprehensive set of all of the CS Indicators surveys conducted to date (from 2010 through 2019). These datasets provide a broader view of the indicator findings by including a summary by country, and a more in-depth view of the indicator finding by providing the raw data for individual country surveys. The datasets for the last two years of the survey (2017 and 2019) also include data on the Contextual Measures (formerly the CS Index) grouped into four main sectors – finance, health and social environment, access and utilization. The CS Index tables from 2003 through 2015 (conducted every three years until 2015) can also be found here. The datasets are easily downloadable into an Excel file.
- 2010 CS Indicators Dataset
- 2011 CS Indicators Dataset
- 2012 CS Indicators Dataset
- 2013 CS Indicators Dataset
- 2014 CS Indicators Dataset
- 2015 CS Indicators Dataset
- 2017 CS Indicators Dataset
- 2019 CS Indicators Dataset
The Harmonized Contraceptive Security (CS) Indicators Dataset consolidates eight rounds of CS Indicators surveys into a single dataset. The dataset is structured to facilitate cross-national and longitudinal analysis of key CS indicators and made public to encourage widespread use of the data amongst the broader research community.
The harmonized dataset includes 238 variables across 335 country-years – for more than 79,000 data points – with 58 countries included for at least one survey-year. The dataset’s variables are a mix of recoded data from original CS surveys along with indicators that have been harmonized and/or transformed to facilitate analysis across survey years. For example, where the wording of questions or response options may have changed across survey years, rules were created to harmonize differences across the years and thus to create a single standard indicator for analysis. Additional modifications made to ease analysis include: (a) assigning numerical values for free, categorical, or ordinal survey responses; (b) collapsing highly detailed categories into digestible baskets; and in some cases, (c) creating simplified supra-indicators (e.g. “data availability”) where only detailed or highly-varied indicators existed previously.
The file also includes several worksheets of supporting documentation to ease use and ensure transparency in the coding decisions:
- “Master Harmonized CS Dataset” contains the master dataset including all 238 variables and 335 country years
- “Master Coding” lists all variables with a unique coding key, specifies a variable type (raw or derivative), and provides relevant survey years
- “Survey Questions, 2019” provides the full survey question for each variable from the 2019 survey
- “Harmonization Rules” provides the rules underlining the dataset’s 38 harmonized variables and outlines the relevant differences between the survey years
- “Transformation Rules” provides the rules underlining the dataset’s 66 transformed variables and specifies the “feeding variables”
- “Cleaning Log” explains instances where the raw data was changed or modified
- “Caveat List” outlines some caveats for specific variables
Finally, the workbook’s three final worksheets supplement the harmonized dataset by providing key context (e.g. GDP and education data) and outcome (e.g. mCPR, unmet need) variables. These final three worksheets are formatted to be easily merged with the master harmonized dataset, with links to the sources provided.
When using this data in published research, please cite: USAID Global Health Supply Chain Program-Procurement and Supply Management. "Harmonized CSI Dataset, 2010-2019," 22 Jan 2021. https://www.ghsupplychain.org/index.php/CSI-Survey-Landing-Page.
For any questions, please reach out to PSMMonitoringandEval@ghsc-psm.org.
Please note that a 508 compliant version of the dataset is coming.
Since the first CS Indicators survey, additional FP-related datasets have been collected, which complement the CS Indicators. While the CS Indicators’ focus is at a high level, focusing on government policy and finances, other datasets explore private sector markets for contraceptives, prices, and other aspects of client access and utilization. Here are some other sources of data on various aspects of CS:
Track20 produces annual data for 18 core FP indicators, 13 of which are reported across the 69 FP2020 focus countries. It has also developed innovative tools such as FP Goals, a new model designed to improve strategic planning, the Family Planning Estimation Tool (FPET), which estimates key FP indicators such as contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR), modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), Unmet Need, and Demand Satisfied, and the National Composite Index for Family Planning (NCIFP), which measures the existence of policies and guidelines, as well as the extent to which FP program implementation includes measurable dimensions of quality service provision.
Track20 is also working to track country-level FP expenditures by combining information from three sources:
- Kaiser Family Foundation collects data from the largest donors on financial flows for family planning.
- The World Health Organization uses a System of Health Accounts (SHA) framework which produces data on total health expenditures as well as reproductive, newborn, maternal and child health expenditures, to which the category of FP expenditures has been added.
- UNFPA's Family Planning Expenditures Tracking surveys (administered by Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute) collects expenditure data on specific projects such as FP.
The UNFPA World Population Dashboard showcases global population data, including fertility rate, information on sexual and reproductive health, and much more. Together, these data shine a light on the health and rights of people around the world, especially women and young people. This dashboard is one of four dashboards housed on the UNFPA website data page, which provides an overview of UNFPA recipient countries, allocation of funding and results. The dashboard numbers come from UNFPA and fellow UN agencies, and are updated annually.
Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) collects a nationally representative sample of data from households and service delivery points in selected sentinel sites to estimate health indicators on an annual basis in 11 pledging FP2020 countries (Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria and Uganda). PMA questionnaires capture information on many key FP indicators, including demand and utilization, as well as new unique measures of access, choice and quality of FP information and services; and other health indicators.
USAID aims to improve method choice to help strengthen country health systems and ensure wide contraceptive method mix, particularly in vulnerable and underserved populations. GHSC-PSM contracted IQVIA, a leading global provider of advanced analytics, technology solutions and contract research services to the life sciences industry, to provide granular data and analysis, to obtain data services aimed at allowing USAID to conduct a contraceptive procurement analysis and provide a picture of the total market contraceptive situation, with a specific focus on the method mix in: LAC, Benin, Togo, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa.
Funded by USAID and implemented by Palladium, HP+ has developed several FP tools, including:
- The FP Sustainable Development Goals Model (FP-SDGs model) projects medium- and long-term effects of three different FP scenarios in any country to show how investments in FP, education, and the economy and accelerate progress toward the SDGs.
- The Total Market Approach (TMA) Projection Tool estimates the FP and financial impacts of increased commercial sector investment in FP.
- The ImpactNow model estimates the health and economic impacts of FP in the near term. It is designed to model the impacts of different policy scenarios, and to compare the results of those scenarios in advocacy materials.
This comprehensive database aims to increase the monitoring and evaluation capacity, skills and knowledge of those who plan, implement, monitor and evaluate FP/RH programs worldwide. The database features:
- A menu of the most widely used indicators for evaluating FP/RH programs in developing countries
- 35 technical areas with over 420 key FP/RH indicators, including definitions, data requirements, data sources, purposes and issues
- Links to more than 120 websites and documents containing additional FP/RH indicators
FPwatch was designed to generate evidence on contraceptive availability through surveys administered to all public and private health facilities and outlets. Launched in 2014, FPwatch provided data on the composition, performance and service readiness of the total FP market in five countries (Ethiopia, Nigeria, DRC, Burma and India). This included range and availability of modern FP methods and services, private outlet consumer prices, relative market share by method/outlet type and market readiness for FP service delivery. FPwatch was a PSI research project.